Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2026

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Supreme Court Reshapes UK Competition Class Actions Landscape

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

In only its third decision on the rapidly evolving UK competition class action regime, the UK Supreme Court's decision ([2025] UKSC 48) in the FX class action...

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

In only its third decision on the rapidly evolving UK competition class action regime, the UK Supreme Court's decision ([2025] UKSC 48) in the FX class action (Michael O'Higgins FX Class Representative Ltd v Barclays Bank Plc and others) marks a pivotal moment for the regime. By overturning the Court of Appeal (CoA) judgment ([2023] EWCA Civ 876) and restoring the Competition Appeal Tribunal's (CAT) refusal to certify the claim on an opt-out basis ([2022] CAT 16), the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the CAT's gatekeeper role, emphasised the importance of the strength of a claim to certification on an opt-out basis, and clarified that the regime requires a balancing between considerations of access to justice and the protection of defendants from unmeritorious opt-out claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from