Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 DECEMBER 2024

Post-Illumina: EU Competition Authorities Have Three Options To Still Catch Below-threshold Acquisitions

The European Commission's effort to address "killer acquisitions" through the Art.22 EUMR referral policy was invalidated by the ECJ. Competition authorities now focus on national call-in powers, sectoral inquiries, and abuse of dominance rules.

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

For some time now, the European Commission (EC) and national competition authorities (NCAs) have been striving to catch so-called "killer acquisitions" under their merger control rules to thereby close a perceived enforcement gap. In March 2021, the EC thought it had found the solution by amending its Art.22 EUMR referral policy, but this approach has recently been invalidated by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) (see our briefing here). The quest continues though, and we describe below the three main avenues still available to the competition authorities to tackle these transactions.

Background

In September 2020, Illumina announced its acquisition of Grail, a start-up active in pipeline cancer detection technologies, for $8 billion. The transaction was not reportable to the EC or to any Member State as it did not meet the turnover thresholds. Nonetheless, the EC sought to review the deal by requesting and accepting a referral request under Art.22 EUMR by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from