Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2023

Tenfiz ve Tanıma Davalarının Koşulları ile Revision Yasağı

Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office
Contributor
Sakar Law Office

Sakar Law Office

Sakar is a client and solution oriented, investigative and innovative law firm based in Istanbul....

View firm profile
Explore more from Sakar Law Office

Yargılama yetkisi, her devletin egemenliğinin bir uzantısı olarak var olan bir mekanizmadır. Her devlet kendi ülkesinin hukuk kuralları içerisinde yargılama yapar.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gözde Esen Sakar
Gözde Esen Sakar
Deniz Esen
Deniz Esen
Author LinkedIn connections

Yargılama yetkisi, her devletin egemenliğinin bir uzantısı olarak var olan bir mekanizmadır. Her devlet kendi ülkesinin hukuk kuralları içerisinde yargılama yapar.1 Başkaca bir devletin mahkemesinin vermiş olduğu kararların, bir diğer devlette uygulanması için, uygulanması istenen devletin iç hukukunca değerlendirilmiş, bir diğer ifade ile uygulanması istenen devletin iç hukukunca onaylanmış olması gereklidir.2

Yabancı bir ülkede verilen mahkeme kararının Türk mahkemeleri nezdinde kesin hüküm ya da kesin delil olarak kabul edilebilmesi için “Tenfiz” veya “Tanıma” davasının açılması gerekir. Bu davalar, 5718 sayılı Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk ve Usul Hukuk Hakkında Kanunun 54.maddesinde ve 58.maddesinde düzenlenmiştir. Bu makalemizde tenfiz ve tanıma davasının esası ve koşulları ele alınmıştır.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Dispute Resolution In Türkiye 2026

This article examines litigation, arbitration and mediation as distinct but connected methods of resolving cross-border disputes involving Türkiye. It considers jurisdiction, service, security for foreign claimants, arbitral consent, institutional procedures, mandatory mediation and the enforcement of outcomes. The statutory and treaty framework is read alongside the judicial authorities cited in the manuscript.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office
Article

Türkiye Ulusal Yapay Zekâ Stratejisi Eylem Planına Genel ve Hukuki Bir Bakış

Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı (“Bakanlık”) tarafından 18 Ağustos 2026 tarihinde yayımlanan 2026–2030 Türkiye Yapay Zekâ Eylem Planı (“Eylem Planı”), Türkiye'nin yapay zekâ ekosistemini kapsayıcı bir hukuki, teknik ve ekonomik çerçevede yapılandırmayı hedefleyen 16 öncelikli eylemi ortaya koymaktadır. “Fark Et”, “İstifade Et”, “Üret” ve “Yönet” şeklinde dört temel eksen üzerine inşa edilen Eylem Planı; insan odaklılık, etik sorumluluk, güvenilirlik, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve dijital egemenlik ilkelerini benimsemektedir.
TurkeyTechnology
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office