Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2020

How Should Stylized Word Elements Be Evaluated When Examining Likelihood Of Confusion?

The Analysis of the General Court's TOTU – TOTTO Decision (T-633/19) with a Perspective from Turkey.

TurkeyIntellectual Property

The Analysis of the General Court's TOTU – TOTTO Decision (T-633/19) with a Perspective from Turkey

In cases where the word elements of trademarks are written in a stylized manner and where letters of the word elements cannot be easily distinguished due to the stylized writing style; determining how the word element should be perceived constitutes a problematic area in evaluating likelihood of confusion.

In Turkey, trademark applicants are required to write down the word element of the trademark in the relevant section of the application form that are filed with the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. At this point, the applicants and/or their agents have the wrong expectation that the stylized word elements will be perceived by the Office in the exact same way that they have presented it on paper. This expectation is erroneous, because the main point of consideration for the Office is not how the applicant perceives the word element of the trademark or how it is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from