Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JANUARY 2017

The Turkish Competition Board's Decision Is Annulled In Diye Danışmanlık

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Contributor
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law is an eminent, independent Turkish law firm based in Istanbul. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

The decision of the Board in case Diye Danışmanlık (12.12.2014, 14-51/900-410) where the Board (i) did not find any anticompetitive practice that would trigger a full-fledged investigation (ii) while it considered it necessary to render an Article 9(3) decision ordering Yurddas and Partners ("YP") to cease its Media Barometer system;

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

The decision of the Board in case Diye Danışmanlık (12.12.2014, 14-51/900-410) where the Board (i) did not find any anticompetitive practice that would trigger a full-fledged investigation (ii) while it considered it necessary to render an Article 9(3) decision ordering Yurddas and Partners ("YP") to cease its Media Barometer system; has been cancelled by two different judgments of two different chambers of the Turkish Administrative Courts. The case is interesting as it gave rise to the annulment of the Board's decision through two different judgments based on two different legal reasoning. The relevant judgments have been rendered in two separate annulment proceedings initiated by the investigated company (YP) and the complaining party (Association of TV Broadcasters).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from