Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2021

The Board Keeps Supplier-Dealer Relations Under The Spotlight

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Contributor
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law is an eminent, independent Turkish law firm based in Istanbul. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

The Turkish Competition Board published its reasoned decision concerning the preliminary investigation initiated upon the complaints received from Samuklar Motorlu Araçlar Madencilik İnş. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.'s, which had been a dealer ...

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

The Turkish Competition Board ("Board") published its reasoned decision1 concerning the preliminary investigation initiated upon the complaints received from Samuklar Motorlu Araçlar Madencilik Ins. San. ve Tic. Ltd. Sti.'s ("Samuklar"), which had been a dealer for Brisa Bridgestone Sabanci Lastik San. ve Tic. A.S. ("Brisa") until 2017, for the sale of automobile tires and other products.

In its application, Samuklar alleged that (i) Brisa engaged in discriminatory behavior against Samuklar by way of applying different discount rates, terms, support on investments, expenses, advertisement and marketing etc., (ii) dealers were only able to make certain discounts in their sales, (iii) only certain dealers determined by Brisa were allowed to make sales to fleet customers, and thus, Brisa prevented other dealers from selling to fleet customers, and (iv) certain tire coating companies sold their tire coating products solely to Brisa and Brisa offers relevant products,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from