Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MARCH 2016

Seeking "Competitive Disadvantage" In Abuse Of Dominant Position

Balcioglu Selçuk Eymirlioglu Ardiyok Keki Attorney Partnership
Balcioglu Selçuk Eymirlioglu Ardiyok Keki Attorney Partnership
Contributor
Balcioglu Selçuk Eymirlioglu Ardiyok Keki Attorney Partnership

Balcioglu Selçuk Eymirlioglu Ardiyok Keki Attorney Partnership

Balcıoğlu Selçuk Eymirlioğlu Ardıyok Keki Attorney Partnership (BASEAK) is an Istanbul-based...

View firm profile
Explore more from Balcioglu Selçuk Eymirlioglu Ardiyok Keki Attorney Partnership

Upon the cancellation decision of the Administrative Court, the TCA reevaluated the complaint that the GDSAA abused its dominant position in airport management by discriminating among airlines...

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

Upon the cancellation decision of the Administrative Court, the Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) reevaluated the complaint that the General Directorate of State Airports Authority (GDSAA) abused its dominant position in airport management by discriminating among airlines with respect to slot allocation in airports. The claim regarded charging different rental tariffs to the airports' old airlines (signing leases before 2006) and the new airlines (signing leases after 2006). The new rate is four times more than the previous one.

TCA accepted that the activities of GDSAA, which has a dominant position on "airport management regarding slot assignment market," are secondary degree discrimination, and using different rates for the airlines having an equal position to the GDSAA and signing leases on different dates, could be assessed as discrimination according to the administrative court decision. TCA also accepted that the mentioned activities could cause the loss

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from