Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2023

Reconciliation Institution In Turkish Competition Law

Sayin Law & Consulting
Explore more from Sayin Law & Consulting

The institution of reconciliation was introduced into Turkish competition law with the Law on Amending the Law No. 7246 on the Protection of Competition dated 16.06.2020 ...

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Sayin Law & Consulting
Sayin Law & Consulting
Author LinkedIn connections

The institution of reconciliation was introduced into Turkish competition law with the Law on Amending the Law No. 7246 on the Protection of Competition dated 16.06.2020 and Article 43 of the Law on the Protection of Competition No. 4054. In this respect, the "Regulation on the Reconciliation Procedure to be Applied in Investigations Regarding the Abuse of Dominant Position" ("Reconciliation Regulation") was published by the Competition Authority in the Official Gazette dated 15.07.2021 and numbered 31542.

The first example of the institution of reconciliation in Turkish competition law emerged with the decision of the Competition Board, numbered 21-37/524-258 and dated 05.08.2021. In this decision, as a result of the reconciliation texts submitted by the undertakings party to the investigation within the scope of the investigation opened to determine whether Türk Philips Ticaret A.S., Dünya Dis Ticaret Ltd. Sti., Melisa Elektrikli ve Elektronik Ev Esyalari Bilg.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Turkish Competition Board Imposes Interim Measures On Meta Over WhatsApp Access Restrictions For Third-Party AI Assistants

The Turkish Competition Board (the “Board”) has imposed interim measures on Meta Platforms, Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, WhatsApp LLC and Meta Platforms İstanbul Bilişim Hizmetleri Limited Şirketi (collectively, “Meta”) in connection with amendment to the WhatsApp Business Solution Terms that barred third-party general-purpose generative AI chatbots and assistants from using WhatsApp where AI was the primary service offered to users.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Kolcuoglu Demirkan Koçakli
Kolcuoglu Demirkan Koçakli
Article

Turkish Competition Authority – Uber’s Acquisition Of Certain Getir Business Lines Cleared Subject To Commitments

The Turkish Competition Authority has conditionally approved Uber Technologies' acquisition of Getir's food and grocery delivery operations, marking a significant consolidation in Turkey's digital marketplace. As part of the approval, Uber committed to investing USD 500 million in Turkey to support employment and strengthen the country's digital technology ecosystem.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
Article

The Turkish Competition Authority Releases A Leading Food Delivery Platform From Most Of Its Binding Commitments Following The Loss Of Its Dominance, But Keeps The Narrow Price Parity Commitment In Place For Two More Years

This article examines the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) Yemek Sepeti Decision[1] (“Decision”), assessing a request for the removal of commitments made binding in 2021, under the “material change” condition of Article 43(4)(a) of Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”).
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Paksoy
Paksoy
Article

Commitments And Changing Market Conditions: The Yemeksepeti Case

The Turkish Competition Board has partially lifted commitments previously imposed on Yemeksepeti, finding that the online food delivery market has evolved from a near-monopoly to a competitive multi-player environment. This decision examines how binding commitments may be reassessed when market conditions materially change, and explores the treatment of most-favoured-nation clauses under both antitrust and abuse of dominance provisions.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Moroglu Arseven
Moroglu Arseven
Article

Turkish Competition Board Finds No Infringement In A101 And CarrefourSA Parallel Pricing Investigation

The investigation originated from a series of consumer complaints submitted from late 2023 onwards, which pointed to identical or closely aligned prices for products such as eggs, yoghurt, rice, butter and wafers across several national grocery retailers. The complaints also alleged that price increases were frequently implemented on the same or nearby dates.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Article

European Commission – SAP's Commitments Made Legally Binding

The European Commission has issued a commitment decision addressing SAP's practices in the aftermarket for maintenance and support services for its on-premises ERP software. Following preliminary findings that SAP may have abused its dominant position through restrictive contract terms and fees, the company has agreed to implement global changes allowing customers greater flexibility in choosing maintenance providers and modifying contract terms. These legally binding commitments will remain in effect for 1
European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
NAZALI Attorney Partnership