Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Navigating Attorney-Client Privilege: A Closer Look At The Turkish Competition Board's Oriflame Decision

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Contributor
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law is an eminent, independent Turkish law firm based in Istanbul. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

This case summary aims to provide information on the Turkish Competition Board's decision regarding Oriflame Kozmetik Ürünleri Tic. Ltd. Şti., shedding light on the Board's approach to the principle of attorney-client privilege ...

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

I. Introduction

This case summary aims to provide information on the Turkish Competition Board's ("Board") decision1 regarding Oriflame Kozmetik Ürünleri Tic. Ltd. Şti. ("Oriflame"), shedding light on the Board's approach to the principle of attorney-client privilege concerning documents obtained by the Turkish Competition Authority ("Authority") during on-site inspections. In its decision, the Board evaluates Oriflame's request that a portion of the documents seized during the Authority's on-site inspection within the scope of a preliminary investigation be considered under the attorney-client privilege, given that the relevant correspondence pertains to the interaction between the undertaking (i.e., Oriflame) and its independent attorney.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from