Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2015

Ancillary Status Of Non-Compete Obligations In The Cement Sector: Issues Of Geographic Scope

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
Contributor
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law is an eminent, independent Turkish law firm based in Istanbul. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law

In Turkey, non-complete obligations may be evaluated under the scope of "agreements that restrict competition" or "abusive conducts of dominant undertakings".

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

In Turkey, non-compete obligations may be evaluated under the scope of "agreements that restrict competition" or "abusive conducts of dominant undertakings" (Article 4 and 6 of Law No. 4054 on Protection of Competition ("Law No. 4054"), akin to Article 101 and 102 of TFEU, respectively). However, non-compete obligations in mergers and acquisitions1 may benefit from the "ancillary restraints" regime. The Turkish Competition Board ("Board"), along with the other competition law authorities, allows certain non-compete obligations to be imposed on the sellers in in merger and acquisitions to the extent they are (i) directly related to and (ii) necessary for the implementation of the concentration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from