Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 OCTOBER 2022

İki Yili Geride Birakirken Uzlaşma Müessesesi

Pekin Bayar Mizrahi (in alliance with Norton Rose Fulbright)
Explore more from Pekin Bayar Mizrahi (in alliance with Norton Rose Fulbright)

Bilindiği üzere 16.06.2020 tarihli ve 7246 sayılı Kanun'la 4054 sayılı Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun'un ("Kanun") 43. maddesinin beşinci fıkrasına getirilen değişiklik neticesinde rekabet hukuku...

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
S. Asli Kucuroğlu Alkan
S. Asli Kucuroğlu Alkan
Senem Golge Yalcin
Senem Golge Yalcin
Author LinkedIn connections

I. Genel Olarak Uzlaşma Müessesesi

Bilindiği üzere 16.06.2020 tarihli ve 7246 sayılı Kanun'la 4054 sayılı Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun'un (“Kanun”) 43. maddesinin beşinci fıkrasına getirilen değişiklik neticesinde rekabet hukuku mevzuatına kazandırılan uzlaşma uygulaması ile Rekabet Kurulu (“Kurul”), ilgililerin talebi üzerine veya re'sen, soruşturma sürecinin hızlı bitirilmesinden doğacak usuli faydaları ve ihlalin varlığına veya kapsamını göz önüne alarak uzlaşma usulünü başlatabilmekte ve soruşturmanın sonlandırılmasına karar verebilmektedir.

Uzlaşma müessesesi kapsamında, soruşturma tarafı teşebbüslerin ihlalin varlığı ve kapsamı ile sair ilgili hususları kabul ettiğini içeren uzlaşma metnini sunmasıyla Kurul tarafından, soruşturmanın söz konusu teşebbüsler bakımından sonlandırılmasına ve idari para cezasında %10 ila %25 arasında indirim yapılmasına karar verilebilmektedir. Soruşturmanın uzlaşma ile sona erdirilmesi sonucunda teşebbüsler, idari

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Turkish Competition Board Imposes Interim Measures On Meta Over WhatsApp Access Restrictions For Third-Party AI Assistants

The Turkish Competition Board (the “Board”) has imposed interim measures on Meta Platforms, Inc., Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, WhatsApp LLC and Meta Platforms İstanbul Bilişim Hizmetleri Limited Şirketi (collectively, “Meta”) in connection with amendment to the WhatsApp Business Solution Terms that barred third-party general-purpose generative AI chatbots and assistants from using WhatsApp where AI was the primary service offered to users.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Kolcuoğlu Demirkan Koçaklı Attorneys at Law
Kolcuoğlu Demirkan Koçaklı Attorneys at Law
Article

Commitments And Changing Market Conditions: The Yemeksepeti Case

The Turkish Competition Board has partially lifted commitments previously imposed on Yemeksepeti, finding that the online food delivery market has evolved from a near-monopoly to a competitive multi-player environment. This decision examines how binding commitments may be reassessed when market conditions materially change, and explores the treatment of most-favoured-nation clauses under both antitrust and abuse of dominance provisions.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Moroglu Arseven
Moroglu Arseven
Article

Turkish Competition Authority – Uber’s Acquisition Of Certain Getir Business Lines Cleared Subject To Commitments

The Turkish Competition Authority has conditionally approved Uber Technologies' acquisition of Getir's food and grocery delivery operations, marking a significant consolidation in Turkey's digital marketplace. As part of the approval, Uber committed to investing USD 500 million in Turkey to support employment and strengthen the country's digital technology ecosystem.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
Article

The Turkish Competition Authority Releases A Leading Food Delivery Platform From Most Of Its Binding Commitments Following The Loss Of Its Dominance, But Keeps The Narrow Price Parity Commitment In Place For Two More Years

This article examines the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) Yemek Sepeti Decision[1] (“Decision”), assessing a request for the removal of commitments made binding in 2021, under the “material change” condition of Article 43(4)(a) of Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition (“Law No. 4054”).
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
Paksoy
Paksoy
Article

European Commission – SAP's Commitments Made Legally Binding

The European Commission has issued a commitment decision addressing SAP's practices in the aftermarket for maintenance and support services for its on-premises ERP software. Following preliminary findings that SAP may have abused its dominant position through restrictive contract terms and fees, the company has agreed to implement global changes allowing customers greater flexibility in choosing maintenance providers and modifying contract terms. These legally binding commitments will remain in effect for 1
European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
Article

Turkish Competition Board Finds No Infringement In A101 And CarrefourSA Parallel Pricing Investigation

The investigation originated from a series of consumer complaints submitted from late 2023 onwards, which pointed to identical or closely aligned prices for products such as eggs, yoghurt, rice, butter and wafers across several national grocery retailers. The complaints also alleged that price increases were frequently implemented on the same or nearby dates.
TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law