Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2026

Insolvency And Arbitration In Thailand: Working Without A Statute

Tilleke & Gibbins
Tilleke & Gibbins
Contributor
Tilleke & Gibbins

Tilleke & Gibbins

Tilleke & Gibbins has been present in Vietnam since 1992, when it became the first foreign law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Tilleke & Gibbins

Thai law offers no explicit guidance on how arbitration and insolvency interact, leaving practitioners to navigate the intersection of two separately drafted statutes—the Bankruptcy Act and the Arbitration Act—without settled rules. Key questions about representation, enforcement of awards, and the treatment of foreign insolvency proceedings depend on inference from general principles rather than express provisions.

ThailandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Thai law contains no provision that speaks directly to what happens to an arbitration when one of the parties becomes insolvent. The interaction between arbitration and insolvency is derived instead from the general operation of two separately drafted laws: the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940) and the Arbitration Act B.E. 2545 (2002). Because Thai courts have had few opportunities to interpret how these two statutes apply together, the practical answer to many questions, such as who represents an insolvent party in arbitration, whether an award will be enforced, and what happens to a foreign proceeding, depends on inference from general principles of insolvency, arbitration, and procedural law rather than on settled rules.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from