Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2026

Maintaining Privilege In AI-assisted Internal Investigations

Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Contributor
Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

We are a leading Swiss business law firm with offices in Zurich, Geneva and Singapore. We take care...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd

Louis Burrus is a legal professional featured in the lawyer directory at SW Legal. His profile provides access to his professional background, areas of practice, and contact information for those seeking legal representation or consultation.

SwitzerlandTechnology

Key Take-aways

1. Swiss law has no AI-specific privilege rules. Whether AI-generated investigation outputs are protected turns on counsel directed legal analysis – a question Swiss courts have yet to resolve.

2. Several regimes may apply cumulatively; privilege, data protection, and the blocking statute – each constraining how and where AI tools may be used.

3. Privilege over AI outputs is won or lost before deployment. Poor governance produces unprotected, potentially discoverable investigation material at the worst possible moment.

1 Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being employed in corporate internal investigations. The primary drivers are practical: AI dramatically reduces first pass document review times, identifies patterns in large datasets that human reviewers might miss, extracts key data points for tabular comparison, and rapidly produces structured interview records. In complex, multijurisdictional investigations spanning millions of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from