Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2019

Don't Act Surprised

Prager Dreifuss AG
Prager Dreifuss AG
Contributor
Prager Dreifuss AG

Prager Dreifuss AG

Prager Dreifuss is an independent, full-service law firm with over 37 years of experience in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Prager Dreifuss AG

It can happen that written stipulations in a contract are not what they seem: a clear obligation cut in stone. This may hold especially true if contracts are governed by Swiss substantive law.

SwitzerlandCorporate/Commercial Law

It can happen that written stipulations in a contract are not what they seem: a clear obligation cut in stone. This may hold especially true if contracts are governed by Swiss substantive law. Under Swiss law, contracts are primarily interpreted in line with the actual intent of the parties. Only if such actual intent cannot be established, the contract will have to be interpreted on the basis of good faith, i.e. based on what a reasonable person would have understood when entering into the contract under the given circumstances.

Applied to a specific case, the use of either of the two interpretation methods may lead to significantly different results. In particular, subjective contract interpretation may take into account the individual conduct of the parties after entering into the contract. If the parties do not follow the provisions of the contract closely, such deviation from the contract might be interpreted as a modification and, hence, has the potential

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from