Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MARCH 2014

Unreported Judgment With Case Number: SARS 4/2013

Tuchten J of the North Gauteng High Court handed down an important judgment in relation to information and documentation obtained by SARS.

South AfricaTax

In an unreported decision, Jen-Chih Huang and 13 others v Commissioner of SARS and others with case number: SARS 4/2013 and dated 18 November 2013 ("the Unreported Judgement"), Tuchten J of the North Gauteng High Court handed down an important judgment in relation to information and documentation obtained by the South African Revenue Service ("SARS") in terms of Part D of the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011 ("the TAA").

The UnreportedJudgment concerned an inquiry in terms of Part C of the TAA that had been convened to begin on 11 November 2013 and which had been preceded by a successful application by SARS for a search and seizure warrant. Prior to the commencement of the inquiry but after the search and seizure had been carried out, the applicants in the Unreported Judgement brought an application to have the granting of the search and seizure warrant reconsidered ("the reconsideration application"). Pending the outcome of the reconsideration application, the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from