Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2020

Taxpayer's Right To Privacy Trumps Public Protector's Powers

In a High Court of South Africa judgment, delivered on 23 March 2020 by Judge J. Mabusa, in the case of CSARS v Public Protector and Others, it was ordered that the South African Revenue Service...

South AfricaTax

In a High Court of South Africa judgment, delivered on 23 March 2020 by Judge J. Mabusa, in the case of CSARS v Public Protector and Others, it was ordered that the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) was permitted to withhold taxpayer information from the Public Protector. The Public Protector's subpoena powers do not entitle it access to taxpayer information relating to former President Jacob Zuma in contravention of SARS' obligation to keep taxpayer information confidential as required in terms of section 69(1) of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (“TAA”).

The essence of the matter was whether SARS was permitted, under the provision of “just cause” contained in section 11(3) of the Public Protector Act, 1994 (“PPA”) read with section 69(1) of the TAA, to withhold taxpayer information and that the Public Protector's subpoena powers do not extend to access to taxpayer information.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from