Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2014

Pay Now Argue Later

When it comes to matters of tax, the Tax Administration Act requires taxpayers to first make payment to SARS on assessment and then to pursue their various remedies.

South AfricaTax

Possession, as they say, is nine tenths of the law. Generally in commercial litigation where, for example, a claim for an outstanding amount is brought against a party, such party is not required to make payment to the claimant until a court has adjudicated on the matter.

However, when it comes to matters of tax, the Tax Administration Act, No. 28 of 2011 ('TAA') requires taxpayers to first make payment to SARS on assessment and then to pursue their various remedies against SARS.

It is true that if the taxpayer eventually persuades SARS or a court that the assessment was incorrect and the tax was not owed by it, the disputed amount will be refunded to the taxpayer with interest. However, the payment of the tax generally places the taxpayer at a disadvantage as it may have to fund the tax payment for a number of years whilst it pursues its various remedies. One recent tax case took approximately ten years from date of assessment until judgment by the Supreme Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from