The High Court, Gauteng Local Division, considered in a recent
case (case No 2012/21359, 31 August 2016) whether an agreement in
terms of which a legal practitioner charged contingency fees to a
client under the Contingency Fees Act, No 66 of 1997 (the
"CFA"), is valid. The court also
considered whether the practitioner was entitled to levy
value-added tax ("VAT") in addition to
the maximum fee of 25% provided for in the CFA.
The case involved an attorney who assisted his client with a
claim against the Road Accident Fund. The attorney entered into an
agreement with the client which stipulated that if the client is
successful with his claim, the client shall pay a fee calculated at
25% (exclusive of VAT) of the total amount awarded or obtained by
the client in consequence of the legal proceedings. The agreement
further stipulated that the total amount charged will therefore be
25% on all amounts awarded or recovered, that VAT at 14% and
disbursements will be added to