Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 SEPTEMBER 2016

Contingency Fees VAT Inclusive Or Exclusive

The High Court, Gauteng Local Division, considered in a recent case whether an agreement in terms of which a legal practitioner charged contingency fees to a client under the Contingency Fees Act, No 66 of 1997, is valid.

South AfricaTax

The High Court, Gauteng Local Division, considered in a recent case (case No 2012/21359, 31 August 2016) whether an agreement in terms of which a legal practitioner charged contingency fees to a client under the Contingency Fees Act, No 66 of 1997 (the "CFA"), is valid. The court also considered whether the practitioner was entitled to levy value-added tax ("VAT") in addition to the maximum fee of 25% provided for in the CFA.

The case involved an attorney who assisted his client with a claim against the Road Accident Fund. The attorney entered into an agreement with the client which stipulated that if the client is successful with his claim, the client shall pay a fee calculated at 25% (exclusive of VAT) of the total amount awarded or obtained by the client in consequence of the legal proceedings. The agreement further stipulated that the total amount charged will therefore be 25% on all amounts awarded or recovered, that VAT at 14% and disbursements will be added to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from