Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2015

The Scrabble Case: Likely To Cause Confusion?

A recent UK court decision involving the trade mark Scrabble is of interest to us in South Africa because it suggests that proof of actual confusion is more important than we sometimes like to think.

South AfricaIntellectual Property

A recent UK court decision involving the trade mark Scrabble is of interest to us in South Africa because it suggests that proof of actual confusion - as opposed to a mere likelihood of confusion - is more important than we sometimes like to think.

I refer to a decision of the UK Court of Appeal in the case of JW Spear & Sons Ltd v Zynga.The facts were that JW Spear (part of the Mattel group) has trade mark registrations for the words Scramble and Scrabble – both registrations cover board games as well as electronic games. Mattel claimed that its trade mark registrations had been infringed by electronic games giant Zynga, which used, in relation to a game not dissimilar to Scrabble, the trade mark Scramble, as well as a logo trade mark comprising the phrase Scramble With Friends, in which the letter 'm' of the word 'Scramble' was highly stylised and arguably looked a bit like a letter 'b' on its side.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from