Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2016

Lucky Fish: Thanking Its Lucky Stars?

We've previously touched on the case of Lucky Star Ltd v Lucky Brands (Pty) Ltd. This litigation recently came to an end when the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") upheld the first court's finding.

South AfricaIntellectual Property

We've previously touched on the case of Lucky Star Ltd v Lucky Brands (Pty) Ltd. This litigation recently came to an end when the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") upheld the first court's finding (Lucky Star Ltd v Lucky Brands (Pty) Ltd).

In this case, a company that sells tinned fish and has registrations for its trade mark Lucky Star in respect of foodstuffs and retail services, sued a company that runs a number of seafood restaurants and takeaway outlets called Lucky Fish for trade mark infringement. In a long and complex judgment, the Western Cape High Court held that there was no infringement.

This finding was taken on appeal, and the SCA handed down a short, sharp judgment that runs to a mere 13 pages. A reading of this judgment creates the impression that the SCA felt that South African courts have, of late, been all over the place when it comes to issues of trade mark infringement, and that it was time to clarify these issues.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from