Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2013

Issue 051 | More On Adwords (With Even More To Come?)

A discussion relating to the case of Louis Vuitton v Google.

South AfricaIntellectual Property
Hans Muhlaberg
Hans Muhlaberg

Issue 33 was entitled The Last Word on Adwords? (note the question mark, which was particularly prescient). For the benefit of those few who don't remember every word of that marvellous missive, it dealt with the case of Louis Vuitton v Google. This European Court decision made it clear that if you buy a competitor's trade mark as an Adword - which you do so that anyone typing in the competitor's name on a Google search is referred to your site – you won't be infringing your competitor's trade mark, provided that you make it clear that your product isn't connected with the competitor. In other words, if you don't cause consumer confusion or, to use modern trade mark terminology, you don't compromise the main function of the trade mark, which is to indicate origin.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from