Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 DECEMBER 2025

Eminem v "Swim Shady"

US rap icon Marshall B. Mathers III (Eminem) is challenging Australian beach-brand "Swim Shady" across two fronts – a cancellation action in the United States and an opposition plus infringement fight in Australia.

South AfricaIntellectual Property

What South African brands and creators should learn

US rap icon Marshall B. Mathers III (Eminem) is challenging Australian beach-brand "Swim Shady" across two fronts – a cancellation action in the United States and an opposition plus infringement fight in Australia.

The core allegation?

That "Swim Shady" will confuse consumers and trade off the reputation of "Slim Shady" and related "Shady" marks. Shortly after the USPTO granted Swim Shady a US registration (September), Eminem filed to cancel it on confusion and false-endorsement grounds.

In Australia, his team opposed Swim Shady's filing and is relying on earlier "Shady" rights; Swim Shady responded with non-use attacks against those older registrations. The dispute is active on both continents and is a useful playbook moment for South African founders, artists, and marketers who love a clever name.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from