Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2019

Undue Delay In Prosecuting Review Applications: A Cautionary Tale

Delaying the prosecution of a review application can carry the risk of a court refusing to hear the application.

South AfricaEmployment and HR

Delaying the prosecution of a review application can carry the risk of a court refusing to hear the application. In Macsteel Trading Wadeville v Francois van der Merwe and others, the Labour Appeal Court ("LAC") had to decide whether the Labour Court erred in:

  • failing to deal with an undue delay in prosecuting a review application, simply because no application in terms of rule 11 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court (the "Rules") was not before it; and
  • reviewing, setting aside and substituting an arbitration award rather than remitting the matter to the relevant bargaining council for a new hearing.

In 2009, Macsteel Trading Wadeville charged its employee Mr Lemson Chiloane with misconduct for his involvement in planning and orchestrating an unprotected and unlawful work stoppage. The work stoppage allegedly included intimidation and incitement to violence. Pursuant to a disciplinary hearing, Mr Chiloane was dismissed from

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from