Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2023

Courts Should Only Adjudicate On Issues Raised In The Pleadings Or During Trial

In the case between Mr Tsietsi Philemon Mashola and Mrs Makwena Delina Mashola, the Supreme Court of Appeal was tasked with determining whether, following their divorce...

South AfricaEmployment and HR

In the case between Mr Tsietsi Philemon Mashola and Mrs Makwena Delina Mashola, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") was tasked with determining whether, following their divorce, Mr Mashola should be subjected to a partial forfeiture order in respect of Mrs Mashola's pension interest/benefit held by the Government Employee Pension Fund ("GEPF").

During the trial it emerged that Mr Mashola had engaged in a long-standing extramarital affair, which had significant impacts on their marital estate, including minimal financial contributions from Mr Mashola and asset transfers to his mistress, Ms Mapula Eva Leshiba.

Evidence presented before the trial

At trial, it was established that Mr Mashola's prolonged extramarital affair with Ms Leshiba lead to the breakdown of the marriage. During this time, Mr Mashola made very minimal contributions to the joint estate and used assets from the joint estate for Ms Leshiba's businesses where he also had shares. Mrs Mashola had to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from