Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2011

Court's Intervention In Disciplinary Hearings: Justifiable Or Just Delay Tactics?

In law, jurisdiction is determined according to whether a particular court has the power or competence to hear and determine an issue between parties.

South AfricaEmployment and HR
Sipelelo Lityi
Sipelelo Lityi
Daniel Breier
Daniel Breier

In law, jurisdiction is determined according to whether a particular court has the power or competence to hear and determine an issue between parties.

A recent decision of the Labour Appeal Court dealt with the issue of whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to intervene in pending or incomplete disciplinary proceedings. The effect of this decision is that an employee facing disciplinary hearings may approach a court to prevent the hearing from taking place, but only in exceptional circumstances for instance to avoid a grave injustice.

In Booysen v The Minister of Safety and Security & others [2011] 1 BLLR 83 (LAC) the Labour Appeal Court was approached by Mr. Booysen, a Director in the South African Police Services. Booysen had been charged with fraud, corruption and perjury in July 2007 and was suspended without pay. The facts are complicated due to the numerous attempts by Booysen and his legal representative to apply for relief to both the Labour Court and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from