Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 OCTOBER 2020

To Litigate Or Arbitrate – That Is The Question

Carey Olsen
Carey Olsen
Contributor
Carey Olsen

Carey Olsen

With a heritage that dates back to 1898, Carey Olsen is one of the most established and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Carey Olsen

The tension between the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court to determine whether a company should be wound up on the just and equitable ground and the contractual obligation to arbitrate disputes between shareholders exists in multiple jurisdictions.

SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Carey Olsen Singapore team considers a recent trend in cases involving the extent of the Court's jurisdiction to determine a just and equitable winding up petition when faced with a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.

The tension between the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court to determine whether a company should be wound up on the just and equitable ground and the contractual obligation to arbitrate disputes between shareholders exists in multiple jurisdictions. Two recent decisions by the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal and the Hong Kong Court of First Instance provide welcome clarification on the position. It remains to see whether those decisions will be mirrored in other common law jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from