Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JANUARY 2013

The SIAC Rules 2010 And The KLRCA Arbitration Rules 2012: Some observations on the key differences

SIAC Rules adopt a more top down approach in favour of expediency while the KLRCA Rules focus on greater party autonomy.

SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jose Tejada
Jose Tejada
Zi Xiang Leow
Zi Xiang Leow

Background

The necessity of resolving commercial disputes through an effective method of dispute resolution has become increasingly pronounced in light of the rapid growth in crossborder commercial transactions.

The use of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism has become an increasingly attractive means to resolving commercial disputes as it offers parties a confidential and, at times, a less confrontational process which may be rarely found in the adversarial system of litigation in the courts. The arbitral process offers flexibility and party autonomy, and the confidentiality of proceedings is attractive to commercial entities who value long term commercial relationships with each other beyond the dispute at hand.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from