Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2021

(Mis)Using Arbitration Clauses In Winding-up: Till Death Do Us Apart?

Non-payment defaults, whether arising from Covid-19 or otherwise have skyrocketed prompting governments across the world to put in place temporary relief legislation to prevent an unprecedented spiral of insolvencies.

SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Non-payment defaults, whether arising from Covid-19 or otherwise have skyrocketed prompting governments across the world to put in place temporary relief legislation to prevent an unprecedented spiral of insolvencies. These measures will eventually come to an end, as it has in Singapore where on 20 October 2020, certain protective measures against commencing insolvency or winding-up proceedings against companies in Singapore were lifted. With insolvency proceedings at their door, debtors will desperately try to hold on to their companies with their fingernails, raising all manner of disputes which can only be adjudicated by the arbitration clause contained in their contracts – a clause they say, binds them and their creditor, till death do them apart. Can a winding-up petition be derailed by raising disputes, even trivial or manufactured ones, that are nonetheless subject to arbitration?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from