Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2019

Mareva Injunctions In Aid Of Foreign Court Proceedings

In many cases, the dispute has been referred to arbitration abroad or to a foreign court.

SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In China Medical Technologies v Wu Xiaodong [2018] SGHC 178, Audrey Lim JC held that section 4(10) of the Civil Law Act did in fact give the Singapore courts the power to grant a Mareva injunction in aid of foreign court proceedings. In doing so, she preferred the views of Chan Seng Onn J in Multi-Code Electronics Industries (M) v Toh Chun Toh Gordon [2009] 1 SLR(R) 1000 over those of Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) in Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas [2008] 3 SLR(R) 856.

However, Lim JC highlighted the pre-requisites before such power could be exercised. First, the plaintiff must have an accrued cause of action against the defendant that is justiciable in a Singapore court. Second, the Singapore court must have in personam jurisdiction over the defendant in respect of the Singapore action. Regarding the first pre-requisite, Lim JC explained that "a claim is justiciable if it is one for substantive relief which the court has jurisdiction to grant and is a claim that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from