Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MAY 2025

Mergers & Acquisitions Comparative Guide

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Mergers & Acquisitions laws and regulations applicable in Singapore.

SingaporeCorporate/Commercial Law
Leon Yee
Leon Yee
Ramiro Rodriguez
Ramiro Rodriguez
Jennifer Lo
Jennifer Lo
Author LinkedIn connections

What are the key rules/laws relevant to M&A and who are the key regulatory authorities?

Parties are generally free to negotiate the terms and conditions of M&A transactions, subject to compliance with mandatory laws and regulations. The key rules/laws relevant to M&A in Singapore and the regulatory authorities that administer them are summarized below.

Companies Act 1967 of Singapore (Companies Act)

The Companies Act is applicable to all companies incorporated, registered or carrying on business in Singapore. The Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore (ACRA) is the authority with regulatory oversight and is responsible for the administration of the Companies Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Overview Of Key Changes Under The Corporate And Accounting Laws (Amendment) Act 2025

Singapore's Corporate and Accounting Laws (Amendment) Act 2025 introduces significant changes to director appointment procedures, corporate governance requirements, and regulatory compliance obligations. The amendments expand disqualification grounds for directors, introduce new anti-money laundering declarations, and modify operational requirements for companies while removing certain legacy reporting obligations.
SingaporeCorporate/Commercial Law
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

Formation And Interpretation Of Contracts: A Comparative Perspective Between China, Singapore And Malaysia

How do contract formation and interpretation differ across China, Singapore, and Malaysia? This comparative analysis examines the fundamental requirements for valid contracts, the role of good faith obligations, and the practical implications for cross-border commercial transactions in these three major Asian trading jurisdictions.
SingaporeCorporate/Commercial Law
JTJB International Lawyers
JTJB International Lawyers
Article

DHS Proposes $70,000 And $30,000 Fees For F-1 Optional Practical Training

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed a controversial new rule requiring SEVP-certified schools to pay substantial fees—$70,000 for a student's first Optional Practical Training recommendation and $30,000 for each subsequent OPT application, including STEM extensions. With only a 30-day comment period and potential annual costs reaching up to $16.5 billion across nearly 2,500 affected institutions, the proposed regulation is expected to face significant legal challenges if finalized.
United StatesImmigration
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

SEC Proposes Rule Amendments To Expand Retail Access To Private Markets

The SEC has proposed sweeping amendments to expand retail investor access to private market strategies, including changes to performance-based compensation rules for registered investment advisers and modernization of the interval fund framework. The proposals also explore new credential-based pathways for individuals to qualify as accredited investors, potentially opening private offerings to a broader pool of eligible participants.
United StatesFinance and Banking
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Video

The Class Action Weekly Wire – Episode 168: Maryland Federal Court Dismisses ‘Drip Pricing’ Class Action Against Ticket Reseller (Video)

A federal court in Maryland recently ruled on a consumer protection class action against Vivid Seats involving allegations of "drip pricing" - the practice of advertising ticket prices without mandatory fees that are revealed later in checkout. While the court found the company's arbitration agreement unenforceable due to its unilateral modification clause, it ultimately dismissed the lawsuit for failure to adequately allege reliance or injury under Maryland's Consumer Protection Act.
United StatesConsumer Protection
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP