Legal 500

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.’ returned 1,716 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Three More Appeals From Section 2(D) Refusals

    A (current) TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95%
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    WYHA? CROME Confusable With CHROME GIRL For Hair Care Products, Says TTAB

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark CROME for various hair care products, finding the mark confusingly similar to the registered mark CHROME GIRL for, inter alia, hair care products [GIRL disclaimed].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Article

Hulu v. Sound View: The PTAB Sets New Precedent On How To Prove A Reference Is A Printed Publication

Invalidity grounds in IPR that are not based on patents must be based on printed publications. But the nature of the evidence required at the time of institution to show that a non-patent reference is a printed publication...
United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Must The Show Go On?: Some Judges Press Forward Scheduling Remote Patent Bench Trials

    A trial date has been set in Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. v. Serenity Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., Civ. Action No. 17-cv-09922, Doc. No. 680 (S.D.N.Y.)....
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    MINT VELVET Not Confusable With MIDNIGHT VELVET For Clothing, Jewelry, Says TTAB

    The Board dismissed this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of MINT VELVET for jewelry; leather goods, bags and wallets, and clothing, and for retail store, Internet, and catalogue services regarding ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Precedential No. 28: TTAB Rejects Amendment To Goods First Made In Applicant's Appeal Brief

    This rather mundane Section 2(d) appeal was apparently deemed precedential because of the applicant's attempt...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is WHALE FOUNDATION Generic For Marine Wildlife Conservation Services?

    Whales may be rare, but even rarer is a USPTO quadrifusal! The Office refused to register four marks comprising or containing the term PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB: In Context, FIRST TUESDAY Merely Descriptive Of Lottery Services

    North Carolina's specimens of use included explanatory text such as "[n]ew scratch-offs the first Tuesday of every month.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Precedential No. 8: TTAB Orders Cancellation Of "NT-MDT" Registration Due To Nonuse

    In a soporific, yet precedential decision, the Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark NT-MDT (in the design form shown below) for, inter alia, microscopes...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms Rejection Of Specimens That Do Not Associate The Mark With The Goods

    The Board affirmed a refusal to register the alleged mark SLEEP HYGIENE CYCLE on the ground that Applicant's specimens of use failed to show use of the mark with the identified goods
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTAB Says Series Of PREDICTIVE ENTREPRENEUR Educational Lectures Is Not A Single Work

    Returning once again to failure-to-function land, the TTAB reversed a refusal to register the mark PREDICTIVE ENTREPRENEUR
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Appeals From 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Turn Out? - May 26, 2021

    The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE CARE SYSTEMS Confusable With This Word+Design Mark For Chiropractic Services?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE CARE SYSTEMS for, inter alia, chiropractic services [CARE SYSTEMS disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "SMALL WINS" Confusable With "BIG WIN" For Candy?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark SMALL WINS for "sweets and candies, namely, gummies and soft candies," finding confusion likely with the registered mark BIG WIN for "candy.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Which One Of These Three Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was Reversed?

    Here are three recent appeals from mere descriptiveness refusals under Section 2(e)(1). One of the refusals was reversed. Let's see how you do in the role of TTAB judge. [Answer in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Jack Daniel's Seeks Supreme Court Review Of Ninth Circuit's "Bad Spaniels" Ruling

    The Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by Jack Daniel's in the "Bad Spaniels" case is worth a read. [pdf here]. The Appendix may be found here. A response is due on or before September 16, 2022.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Mark Your Calendar: Three Trademark Events This Week

    Well, I'll be holed-up in Eastham, Massachusetts again this week. It's not easy to stay inside on Cape Cod during the summer...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Precedential No.27: TTAB Grants FRCP 56(d) Motion For Discovery To Avoid Summary Judgment Ambush

    Petitioner Anand K. Chakayala, rather than respond to Praise Broadcastings's discovery requests, filed a motion for summary judgment....
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is STAGER Merely Descriptive Of Theatrical Production Software?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark STAGER for, inter alia, downloadable theatrical management application software...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    $533 Million Apple v. Samsung Verdict Highlights Importance Of Design Patents

    In a long-running smartphone case that made headlines when it reached the Supreme Court in 2016, a California jury decided last week that Samsung owes Apple $533 million for infringing three design patents...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

    • Showing 561–580 of 1716 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters