Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2022

TTABlog Test: Is "SMALL WINS" Confusable With "BIG WIN" For Candy?

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The USPTO refused to register the mark SMALL WINS for "sweets and candies, namely, gummies and soft candies," finding confusion likely with the registered mark BIG WIN for "candy.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The USPTO refused to register the mark SMALL WINS for "sweets and candies, namely, gummies and soft candies," finding confusion likely with the registered mark BIG WIN for "candy." The goods are legally identical, and so the Board presumed that they travel in the same trade channels to the same classes of consumers. But what about the marks? How do you think this came out? In re Sugar Free Specialties, LLC, Serial No. 90706411 (December 7, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis)

1260244a.jpg

There was no evidence to suggest that the cited mark is conceptually or commercially weak, and so it merited "the typical scope of protection afforded a mark registered on the Principal Register pursuant to Trademark Act Section 7(b), 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b)."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from