Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,424 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "SMALL WINS" Confusable With "BIG WIN" For Candy?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark SMALL WINS for "sweets and candies, namely, gummies and soft candies," finding confusion likely with the registered mark BIG WIN for "candy.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Video

    TTABlog Test: Is TEQUILUSA For Alcoholic Beverages Confusable With The TEQUILA Certification Mark?

    The Board made quick work (an opinion of a mere 11 pages) of this opposition to registration of the mark TEQUILUSA for "alcoholic beverages, except beer," finding a likelihood of confusion...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "THE CHIRO PLACE" Confusable With "THE CHIRO SPOT" For Chiropractic Services?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark THE CHIRO PLACE, in standard form ("CHIRO" disclaimed), finding confusion likely with the registered mark THE CHIRO SPOT ("CHIRO" disclaimed), both for chiropractic services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is WHALE FOUNDATION Generic For Marine Wildlife Conservation Services?

    Whales may be rare, but even rarer is a USPTO quadrifusal! The Office refused to register four marks comprising or containing the term PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: JEWEL BOX Confusable With GEM BOX? Anti-Aging Preparations Related To Clothing? ECO-BRICKS Merely Descriptive Of Toy Blocks?

    Here are three mildly interesting recent TTAB decisions. How do you think they came out? [Answers in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Video

    TTABlog Test: Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals - How Did They Come Out?

    A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Three Recent Section 2(d) Inter Partes Cases - How Did They Come Out?

    Here are three recent TTAB decisions in Section 2(d) inter partes proceedings. Not knowing all the facts, see if you can guess how they came out.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Try Your Luck On These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals

    According to one TTAB judge, you can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which Of These Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was/Were Reversed?

    The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was/Were Reversed?

    The TTAB recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness (or disclaimer) refusals summarized below.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Was Dismissed?

    A TTAB judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods/services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Refusal Was/Were Reversed?

    The TTAB recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized below. At least one of the three refusals was reversed.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Which Of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?

    The TTAB (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized below. At least one of the three refusals was reversed.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    USPTO Seeks Candidates For Administrative Trademark Judge At The TTAB

    The USPTO is seeking applications for the position of Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The application period is open until September 8, 2020.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    WORLD'S BEST DOWN Incapable Of Functioning As A Trademark For Bedding Containing Down, Says TTAB

    The Board affirmed a refusal to register, on the Supplemental Register, the phrase WORLD'S BEST DOWN for bedding containing down [DOWN disclaimed]
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Precedential No. 39: TTAB Again Cuts Some Procedural Slack Due To 2017 Rule Changes

    In another precedential interlocutory ruling from 2017 that eluded this blogger, the Board refused to allow Applicant Rural Health to submit certain non-party discovery depositions by way of notice of reliance, ...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Fourth Circuit Returns Long-Running FLANAX Case To E.D. Virginia On Laches, Statute Of Limitations, And Tolling Issues

    After fourteen (14) years of litigation at the TTAB and in the courts, the battle between Bayer and Belmora over the mark FLANAX continues.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?

    The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. No hints this time. Let's see how you do with them. Answer will be found in the first comment.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB Entry Of Judgment As Sanction For Failure To Comply With Discovery Orders

    In a nonprecedential decision, the CAFC affirmed the TTAB's entry of judgment against Respondent Kris Kaszuba...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Does A Law School Professor Have Standing To Oppose RAPUNZEL For Dolls And Toy Figures?

    [This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a 2L at University of Notre Dame Law School].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Showing 641–660 of 1424 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics