The TTAB recently decided the appeals
from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness (or disclaimer)
refusals summarized below. At least one of them was reversed.
Let's see how you do with them. Answer(s) will be found in the
first comment.
In re MCM Industries, LLC, Application Serial No. 88380496
(March 4, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W.
Wellington). [Section 6 requirement for disclaimer of
"JEWELED" in the mark JEWELED
LULLABY for jewelry. The examining attorney submitted
dictionary definitions of "jeweled" as well as
marketplace evidence showing the term used descriptively in
connection with jewelry by several third parties.]
In re The Trustees of the Crown Acquisitions Discretionary
Trust, Serial No. 88666035 (March 9, 2021)[not
precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. Bergsman). [Mere
descriptiveness refusal of THE LUXURY
COLLECTIVE for "Bed sheets; Blanket throws; Burp
cloths; Comforters; Mattress pads; Sleeping bags
