Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

829 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Understanding Wrongful Termination In New York

    Have you ever wondered if your firing was unfair or even illegal?
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Mizrahi Kroub
    Mizrahi Kroub
  • Article

    Validity Of Final Warnings Where Employee Does Not Appeal

    When deciding whether or not it is reasonable for an employer to dismiss an employee, the tribunal may look behind the employer's decision to issue a prior final warning even where the employee failed to appeal that prior final warning.</
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
Article

Wrong Response To Pay Complaint Can Pose Big Risks

Betty works for The Big Store as a non-exempt Accounts-Payable Clerk. She is assigned to help with taking a merchandise inventory over one weekend, and she works a total of 60 hours in that workweek.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Fisher Phillips LLP
Fisher Phillips LLP
  • Article

    When Does An Employee Suffer From A "Serious Health Condition" Under CFRA?

    A look behind the true meaning of "medical leave" in California.
    United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
    Sheppard
    Sheppard
  • Article

    Minding The Pay Gap: What Employers Need To Know As Pay Equity Protections Widen

    The pay gap – or paying women and other historically marginalized groups less for the same or substantially similar work – has long been in the media spotlight.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Littler Mendelson
    Littler Mendelson
  • Article

    SCOTUS Might Not Rule On The Standing Of ADA Title III Testers After All

    Seyfarth Synopsis: The Plaintiff in Acheson v. Laufer dismisses her lawsuit with prejudice and asks SCOTUS to dismiss its pending review based on mootness.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • Article

    A Charge-d Atmosphere: A Few Pointers When A Current Employee Files A Charge

    Most employers have had to respond to a discrimination charge filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and/or a corresponding state agency.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • Article

    A Cup Of Coffee - And A Dismissal - To Go

    Last month, Federal District Court Judge Stanley A. Bastian dismissed at oral argument a shareholder suit challenging the Starbucks DEI initiatives. The Court has now issued a brief, yet informative...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    IRS Reverses Its Position On Effect Of Certain Termination Of Employment Provisions On Payments Under Performance Based Plans

    On January 25th, the IRS released a Private Letter Ruling reversing its previous position on the impact of certain termination of employment provisions on performance based payments intended to be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
    Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
  • Article

    Second Time's A Charm? (Beltway Buzz, October 16, 2020)

    Senator Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is promising a vote on a slimmed-down economic stimulus package during the week beginning October 19, 2020.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
  • Article

    Tenth Circuit Upholds Discharge Of Employee In Safety-Sensitive Position Who Tested Positive For Cocaine

    The Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Kansas, employs random drug testing for those in safety-sensitive positions.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
  • Article

    Termination Of Employee Based On Her Marriage To An Undocumented Alien Does Not Violate Title VII

    In 2011, the United States Supreme Court held in "Thompson v. North American Stainless" that an employer may violate Title VII by retaliating against an employee.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Termination Of Employee Based On Her Marriage To An Undocumented Alien Does Not Violate VII

    In 2011, the United States Supreme Court held in Thompson v. North American Stainless that an employer may violate Title VII by retaliating against an employee who is related to a worker engaged in conduct protected by Title VII—even if the employee himself neither raised a claim of discrimination nor engaged in any protected conduct.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Erisa Plan Participants Must Demonstrate Actual Or Imminent Risk Of Loss To Establish Article Iii Standing To Pursue Statutory Claims Regarding The Alleged Mismanagement Of Plan Funds

    On June 1, 2020, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh and joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito and Gorsuch, held that plaintiffs...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    A&O Shearman
    A&O Shearman
  • Article

    Pennsylvania Court Allows Medical Pot User To Proceed With Wrongful Termination Suit

    In a recent decision, Palmiter v. Commonwealth Health Systems, the Pennsylvania Court of Common ...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • Article

    California Enacts Two New AI In Employment Bills: What’s Coming In 2027

    California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two new AI in employment bills that will go into effect as of January 1, 2027. These bills will limit and regulate the use of artificial intelligence decision making in the employer-employee relationship.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Foley & Lardner LLP
  • Article

    Can You Sue For Wrongful Termination In New Jersey?

    In the intricate landscape of employment law, wrongful termination poses a significant challenge for employees who find themselves at the unfortunate intersection of job loss and potential injustice.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Romano Law
    Romano Law
  • Article

    E-Mails Between Client And Attorney Are Not Privileged Communications When Sent On Employee's Work E-Mail Account

    Gina Holmes sued her employer, Petrovich Development Company, and Paul Petrovich for sexual harassment, constructive termination, violation of the right to privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Thoits, Love, Hershberger & McLean
    Thoits, Love, Hershberger & McLean
  • Article

    First Circuit Concludes Employee's Wrongful Termination, Other State Law Claims Are Preempted By Federal Law

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (covering Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island) recently awarded a victory to employers litigating claims...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Foley & Lardner LLP
  • Article

    Handling Workplace Vigilantes

    Recently, an Oregon Home Depot worker claimed that he was fired for helping a customer pursue a man she claimed kidnapped her child.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Butler Snow LLP
    Butler Snow LLP
  • Showing 321–340 of 829 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics