2,877 results found

What's the difference between a ‘brand' and a ‘strong brand name'? … The value of a brand is built over time by continuous investments in marketing, research and development, constant product...

The well known dicta of trademarks, deceptive similarity and the akin, have been recounted time and again, to resolve various disputes that appear forth the courts.

The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademark (CGPDTM) has vide its public notice dated April 15, 2020.

CIPAM on January 24, 2018, released two reports titled ‘Intellectual Property Rights Regime In India- Initiatives by the Government' and ‘Intellectual Property Rights Regime In India- An Overview'.

The case of "KMG International Ltd. v. KMG Industrial Traders Ltd." [2008 (37)PTC 548 (Del.)] witnesses the Court taking a view on trademark disputes whereby the parties belonged to the same group or had a common origin.

In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court ruled on the scope of honest and concurrent use under the Indian trademark law.

The Delhi HC in a consolidated judgment led by Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. v. NIXI & Anr.

The Delhi HC vide its order dated May 30, 2024 ("Order"), passed in the matter of Independent News Service Private Limited and another vs. Ravindra Kumar Chaudhary and others...

Represented by team Anand and Anand, filmmaker Mukesh Bhatt's production company Vishesh Films Pvt. Ltd obtained a major relief as the Delhi High Court on September 2...

A Legal Proceedings Certificate or LPC is prima facie evidence of any entry made in the Trade Marks Register. As is the case in most countries, intellectual property offices...

The Indian Registrar of Trade Marks had previously announced the abandonment of trade mark applications and oppositions.

The quality of cosmetic products should be treated as seriously as medicines and paramedic products.

In three applications for the grant of interim injunction Preeti Suparia Co. prayed for an order to restrain Narain Dass Tulsani and Ors. from producing, manufacturing, marketing selling or advertising their confectionary using the range of impugned marks or labels.

The Delhi High Court has identified critical inconsistencies in how territorial jurisdiction is determined in intellectual property disputes, particularly those involving online transactions and e-commerce. A Single Judge has referred three fundamental questions to a Larger Bench to resolve the conflicting interpretations of the Civil Procedure Code, Trade Marks Act, and Copyright Act provisions that govern where IP suits can be filed.

The question of interpretation of law to ensure that no miscarriage of justice ensues from the verdict has been up for consideration of the courts on many an occasion.

In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from 15.03.2021, is greater than 90 days, that longer period shall apply.