Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

390 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    LD Mannheim, April 20, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_1291/2026, Anti-Anti Suit Injunction Against “Interim Licence” Application Before Chinese Court

    The UPC has jurisdiction to issue an AASI to secure pending patent infringement proceedings before the UPC (Art. 31, 32(1)(c), 33(1)(a) UPCA) (mn. 16 et seq.)
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    LD Munich, August 30, 2024, Decision On Infringement Action And Counterclaim For Revocation, UPC_CFI_52/2023

    Confirmation of CoA's standard re. claim construction in 10x Genomics v. NanoString Technologies (UPC_CoA_335/2023 App_576355/2023)...
    GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    BGH, Urteil Vom 24. Oktober 2017 - "Trommeleinheit" – Az. X ZR 55/16, GRUR-Prax 2018, 50

    Der Bundesgerichtshof knüpft an seine Rechtsprechung in den Entscheidungen „Flügelradzähler" und „Palettenbehälter II" an und stellt dabei klar, dass für die Abgrenzung zwischen ...
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    CoA, June 29, 2026, Appeal Decision On Public Access To File Under R. 262.1(b) RoP, UPC_CoA_52/2026 And UPC_CoA_53/2026

    In two parallel infringement proceedings that had been terminated before a decision on the merits was rendered, a law firm applied for access to the parties’ written submissions under R. 262.1(b) RoP, citing educational and advisory purposes. The judge-rapporteur of the Munich LD granted access subject to redactions of confidential information.
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    LD Munich, September 25, 2024, Procedural Order On A Counterclaim For Revocation – Standing To Be Sued, UPC_CFI_114/2024 UPC_CFI_448/2024

    A common situation in patent litigation is that a patent has (allegedly) been assigned from one legal entity (assignor) to another (assignee) and that the assignee asserts the patent before being entered as proprietor into the register.
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    BGH Zu Ausgleichsansprüchen Unter Mitberechtigten An Einem Patent (BGH, Urteil „Sektionaltor II" Vom 16. Mai 2017 – Az. X ZR 85/14)

    Bei der Beurteilung, wann die Zuerkennung eines Ausgleichsanspruchs dem Gebot der materiellen Gerechtigkeit entspricht, sind auch die Gründe zu berücksichtigen ...
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Central Division Paris, January 26, 2026, Order Concerning Review Pursuant To R. 333 RoP, UPC_CFI_999/2025

    "Same party" is a strict concept. Parent and subsidiary are normally distinct parties, even with 100% shareholding or strong control. They are only treated as one if their interests are so identical that a decision...
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Court Of Appeal, June 2, 2025, Order, UPC_CoA_156/2025

    The Court's jurisdiction extends to acts of infringement before the UPCA's entry into force, provided the patent is within the UPC's competence at the time of action
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    German Federal Court Of Justice Confirms The Compulsory License Granted By Way Of A Preliminary Injunction For The AIDS Drug Isentress; The EPO Board Of Appeal Then Revokes The European Patent

    In its judgment, the German Federal Court of Justice dismisses the appeal of the patent proprietor and also substantially follows the German Federal Patent Court with respect to the grounds for its decision.
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    The ECJ On The Interpretation In Line With European Law Of The Legal Validity Of A Patent-in-suit

    The ECJ on the interpretation in line with European Law of the legal validity of a patent-in-suit – a game changer in proceedings for a preliminary injunction due to patent infringement in Germany?
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    LD Paris, October 16, 2026, Decision, UPC_CFI_684/2025, UPC_CFI_2279/2025

    Inventive Step: Starting Points Evaluated as a Whole and Strict Thresholds for Combinations (Art. 56 EPC)
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Court Of Appeal, February 14, 2025, Order On Request For Provisional Measures, UPC_CoA_382/2024

    Means-plus-function features must be understood as any feature suitable for carrying out the function (headnote 1, para. 47).
    GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Referral G 1/23 (T 438/19): Clarification On How To Construe G 1/92?

    This appeal concerns the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition against European patent EP 2 626 911. Its claim 1 specifies a material that is suitable for encapsulating a solar
    GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    IT/Data Protection Newsletter (Summer 2018 Edition)

    One of the requirements will be to enter into a joint-controller data protection agreement with Facebook.
    GermanyPrivacy
    Reed Smith (Worldwide)
    Reed Smith (Worldwide)
  • Article

    Stock Take: Long-arm Jurisdiction At The UPC

    Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyze the Unified Patent Court's evolving long-arm jurisdiction over European Patents, examining landmark cases that define its scope and limitations. The analysis explores how the UPC can extend its reach beyond its borders to adjudicate infringement claims involving non-UPC member states, while identifying the jurisdictional boundaries established by recent Court of Appeal decisions and pending CJEU referrals.
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    A&O Shearman
    A&O Shearman
  • Article

    LD Munich, 14 April 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_119/2025

    As per Rule 271.6.b RoP, service is deemed effective even if physical acceptance of a document is refused, as long as the addressee was properly notified and had a reasonable opportunity to collect it.
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Patentstreitverfahren In Deutschland – Ein Überblick

    Das System für Patentstreitverfahren ist in Deutschland zweigeteilt, wobei Patentnichtigkeits- und Patentverletzungsverfahren vor unterschiedlichen Gerichten verhandelt werden.
    GermanyIntellectual Property
    HLK
    HLK
  • Article

    Court Of Appeal, October 14, 2025, Appeal Against An Order Re. Penalty Payments, UPC_CoA_699/2025

    System of penalties under the Rules of Procedure, specifics of a penalty order (R. 354.3, R.354.4 RoP): Pursuant to R. 354.3 RoP an order or decision may include an order for the forfeiture of a penalty sum in case...
    GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    Court Of Justice Of The European Union: Limitation Of Trademark Rights Only To The Extent Provided For In The Trademarks Directive – Extraterritorial Application Of National Trademark Rights: Possession Abroad

    Two judgments of the CJEU rendered on August 1, 2025, dealt with significant trademark issues of practical importance. The first case, Lunapark/DRACULA, presented the...
    GlobalIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Article

    The Right Of Priorities: Recent Developments In EPO Case Law

    Recent decisions passed by three different instances of the EPO have significant effects on the patentability of inventions under European patent law.
    European UnionIntellectual Property
    Bardehle Pagenberg
    Bardehle Pagenberg
  • Showing 341–360 of 390 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics