Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 SEPTEMBER 2023

Referral G 1/23 (T 438/19): Clarification On How To Construe G 1/92?

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

This appeal concerns the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition against European patent EP 2 626 911. Its claim 1 specifies a material that is suitable for encapsulating a solar

GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This appeal concerns the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition against European patent EP2626911. Its claim1 specifies a material that is suitable for encapsulating a solar cell and comprises certain polymer constituents, physical properties and a specific aluminum content. In the case under appeal, the Board found that the inventive step of the subject matter of claim1 hinges on the question whether the product ENGAGE®8400 was "made available to the public" within the meaning of Art.54(2)EPC.

It was undisputed that documents D1, D2, D5/5a (all except D5 having been published before the earliest priority date) demonstrate that the copolymer ENGAGE®8400, which was commercially available before the earliest priority date, comprises all the properties of the claimed material except its aluminum content. D1 specifically referenced D18 as a document describing the preparation of ENGAGE®8400, and D18 discloses a level of aluminum overlapping with

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from