523 results found

Failure to moderate, edit or remove third party content may result in breaches of the Advertiser Code or the ACL.

Social media is now an integral part of life and work, but its rise is not matched by a understanding of the law online.

The dangers of social media in the work place are well documented.

So, your brand is big on social media? Here are our top 5 survival tips for not getting yourself sued.

The TGA is actively supervising the inappropriate advertisement of therapeutic goods in relation to the coronavirus.

An offensive tweet inspired a review of current telecommunications laws to impose tougher restrictions on social media.

You may have a responsibility to ensure your personal brand, or brands that you are affiliated with, are not tarnished.

If the ACCC wants to control Google and Facebook, it could instead look to the access to services regime in the CCA.

The popular social media campaign by the NSW Police Force is a quick and cost effective method to deliver key messages.

The Advertising Standards Board has handed down two landmark decisions, raising the bar on social media responsibility.

A local council used social media to help prove its case against an unauthorised motorsport facility.

Social media tools like LinkedIn can facilitate the portability of customer information from one employer to the next.

Twitter suffered a data security breach, which compromised accounts of various world leaders and prominent individuals.

You should have a plan in place regarding the management of your digital assets in the event of death or incapacity.

The blocked Twitter users have decided to sue President Trump under the US First Amendment free speech protections.

In a decision which has received considerable local commentary in Australia, the equity division of the New South Wales Supreme Court has granted a worldwide injunction against Twitter (namely Twitter Inc., ...

On 10 February 2011, the Federal Court of Australia handed down judgment in contempt proceedings that may have significant implications for businesses which use social media to market themselves. The Court held that a company and its sole director were responsible for statements made by third parties on the company's Facebook site.