Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JUNE 2026

Second CJEU Ruling In The Pelham Case Defines The Notion Of Pastiche

WH Partners
WH Partners
Contributor
WH Partners

WH Partners

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy. We have...

View firm profile
Explore more from WH Partners

The Court of Justice of the European Union has issued its second ruling in the landmark Pelham case, establishing a legal definition for "pastiche" under EU copyright law. This decision addresses whether sampling in music production can qualify as pastiche and explores the boundaries between artistic freedom and copyright protection.

RomaniaIntellectual Property

Starting with a song produced in 1997, and a legal dispute debuting in 2004, the Pelham saga is a case originating from the German courts which brought to light the interaction between the concept of sampling and copyright. As a technique, sampling involves taking a segment of an existing audio recording and repurposing it in a new composition. From a copyright perspective, such a practice would ordinarily qualify as infringement due to the unauthorised reproduction of protected material. Yet, as the Pelham case illustrates, certain exceptions may legitimately authorise such use. Even more, the EU judges’ conclusions might be commercially relevant for the music industry, as well as having severe ramifications in advertising, content production or gaming branches.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from