Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JUNE 2011

EU Court Advisor Positive On Negative SPC Term Extension

Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) is the owner of a European patent for a medicinal product containing the compound sitagliptine. The application for this patent was filed on 5 July 2002.

NetherlandsIntellectual Property
John Allen
John Allen
Paul Van Dongen
Paul Van Dongen
Liesbeth Weynants
Liesbeth Weynants

Case Summary

Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) is the owner of a European patent for a medicinal product containing the compound sitagliptine. The application for this patent was filed on 5 July 2002. MSD applied for a supplementary protection certificate (SPC) on the basis of the first marketing authorisation ("MA") for this product, which was granted on 21 March 2007. According to article 13 of the Regulation (EC) 469/2009 (SPC-Regulation), the term of an SPC is calculated as the period between the application for the patent and the grant of the fist MA, minus five years. In the case of MSD's sitagliptine product, the SPC extension term would be negative. So why bother with a negative SPC?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from