Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2026

"Accessible" Does Not Mean "Public" When It Comes To Inside Information

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The European Court of Justice has ruled on a critical question in securities law: when does inside information cease to be inside information? In Brännelius (C-229/24)...

NetherlandsCorporate/Commercial Law

If you work in capital markets, compliance or securities law, this one matters. On 16 April 2026, the European Court of Justice ruled in Brännelius (C-229/24) on a deceptively simple question with far-reaching implications: when exactly does inside information stop being inside information?

Here's what happened: A Swedish municipal company told a handful of bidders they'd lost a public contract. Two shareholders in the losing company caught wind through a tip and sold their shares — minutes before a press release tanked the stock price. Their defense? The information was already "public" under Sweden's open-access laws.

The Court wasn't buying it. Three critical takeaways:

  • Telling a small group doesn't make it public. Notifying a limited circle of recipients is not non-discriminatory disclosure.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from