Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2025

Labor Courts May Have Jurisdiction To Resolve Compensation Claims For Moral Damages In Labor Proceedings

Von Wobeser y Sierra, SC
Von Wobeser y Sierra, SC
Contributor
Von Wobeser y Sierra, SC

Von Wobeser y Sierra, SC

Von Wobeser y Sierra is a Mexican law firm founded in 1986 that offers a wide range of legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Von Wobeser y Sierra, SC

On October 31, 2025, the isolated decision with digital registration "2031407" was published in the Federal Judicial Weekly, enabling labor courts to hear and rule on the payment of compensation for moral damages that workers believe they have suffered on the job.

MexicoEmployment and HR
Rafael Vallejo
Rafael Vallejo
Adrián  Castillo
Adrián Castillo
Alejandra Arizpe
Alejandra Arizpe
Sarah Gibert
Sarah Gibert
Alejandro  Pérez
Alejandro Pérez
Ana  Ruiz
Ana Ruiz
Santiago Torres
Santiago Torres
Ricardo Rosas
Ricardo Rosas

On October 31, 2025, the isolated decision with digital registration "2031407" was published in the Federal Judicial Weekly, enabling labor courts to hear and rule on the payment of compensation for moral damages that workers believe they have suffered on the job.

According to this precedent, claims for moral damages will be contingent on discriminatory acts or conduct, such as dismissals due to health conditions or gender-based violence, among others, but also on the Labor Court identifying factors that aggravate the worker's vulnerability in the particular case, in which case it must adjust the procedure to guarantee the analysis and admissibility of all the claims made, including moral damages.

The significance of this new criterion is that, in contrast to the law and legal tradition, moral damages can now be claimed and resolved directly in a labor proceeding and not, as until now, only through an independent claim before civil courts.

Therefore, it is essential to carefully review the processes for resolving internal complaints, imposing sanctions and terminating employment for issues involving discrimination. It is also necessary to implement protocols to prevent gender discrimination and address cases of sexual violence, harassment or assault, as well as to eradicate forced and child labor, since any action that may be perceived as discriminatory or inequitable could lead to a legal and economic contingency greater than those regulated in the Federal Labor Law, adding to them the risk of being ordered to compensate the affected worker for moral damages.

For more information, we share the link to the publication in the Federal Judicial Weekly: https://sjf2.scjn.gob.mx/detalle/tesis/2031407.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from