Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Demystifying ESMA's Latest MiCA Q&As: Clarification Or Reinterpretation?

WH Partners
WH Partners
Contributor
WH Partners

WH Partners

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy. We have...

View firm profile
Explore more from WH Partners

The European Securities and Markets Authority ("ESMA") has recently released two new Q&As under Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation ("MiCA")...

MaltaTechnology

These Q&As go beyond mere clarification. They show how ESMA and national competent authorities ("NCAs") intend to apply MiCA in practice, shaping the authorisation, supervision, and day-to-day compliance expectations for Crypto-Asset Service Providers ("CASPs") and crypto-asset offerors.

Q&A 2653 – Distinguishing execution, RTO and exchange services

Q&A 2653 helps CASPs determine whether their activities amount to:

  1. Execution of orders on behalf of clients – the CASP acts as an agent, concluding contracts for clients without using its own capital. This includes cases where the CASP executes orders directly with another counterparty or through a trading platform.
  2. Reception and transmission of orders ("RTO") – the CASP forwards client orders to another entity for execution, acting purely as an intermediary, without itself trading or using proprietary capital.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from