Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 AUGUST 2023

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Supreme Showdown: Court Rejects Epic Games' Plea To Alter Apple's iOS Rules

WH Partners
WH Partners
Contributor
WH Partners

WH Partners

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy. We have...

View firm profile
Explore more from WH Partners

The three-year-long legal battle between Apple and Epic Games has recently seen new developments, prompted by a decision from the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

MaltaAntitrust/Competition Law

This is the eighth update in relation to the ongoing legal dispute concerning Epic and Apple.

Our First Article, Second Article, Third Article, Fourth Article, Fifth Article, Sixth Article and Seventh Article are accessible via the direct links provided.

The three-year-long legal battle between Apple and Epic Games has recently seen new developments, prompted by a decision from the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. This decision found the previously imposed injunctions on Apple's 'anticompetitive' business model to be invalid, resulting in the overturning of these injunctions. As a result, last week, Epic Games made a request to the Supreme Court for the reinstatement of the original injunction. This request was rejected by Justice Elena Kagan without providing a reason.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from