Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 OCTOBER 2026

3 Legs Good – 2 Legs Better?

GVZH Advocates
GVZH Advocates
Contributor
GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates is a modern and sophisticated legal practice comprised of top-tier professionals,...

View firm profile
Explore more from GVZH Advocates

The European Commission's approach to mobile market consolidation has evolved significantly over two decades, from conditional acceptance of four-to-three operator mergers to more recent clearances of three-player markets. This article traces the Commission's decisional practice through landmark cases, examines the legal framework established by EU Courts, and considers how these precedents might apply to a potential three-to-two mobile network consolidation in Malta.

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

The European Commission’s evolving approach to consolidation in mobile markets

The recently announced agreement under which Melita is to take over Epic has brought the question of mobile market consolidation firmly onto the Maltese agenda. Readers of George Orwell will recall the sheep of Animal Farm, who first bleated “four legs good, two legs bad” and later, when circumstances changed, “four legs good, two legs better”. The history of EU merger control in the mobile sector invites a similar observation. For over a decade, Brussels treated a reduction in the number of mobile network operators (‘MNOs’) with considerable suspicion, and many perceived a market of three operators as the floor below which the European Commission would not go. More recently, the tone of the debate has shifted towards scale, investment and European competitiveness.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from