Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2026

Abusive DSARs After Brillen Rottler And The EDPB’s VRT/NOYB Decision: Relief For Controllers Or False Hope?

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

On March 19, 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its judgment in Brillen Rottler (C-526/24), addressing two issues that frequently arise in practice...

LuxembourgPrivacy

What the CJEU's ruling really changes, and why the EDPB's VRTVRT/NYOB decision matters. 

On March 19, 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its judgment in Brillen Rottler (C-526/24), addressing two issues that frequently arise in practice:

(i) the misuse of data subject access requests (DSARs) for abusive purposes

(ii) the growing risk of compensation claims under the GDPR.

The Court held that a first DSAR can be refused as “excessive” within the meaning of Article 12(5) GDPR where the controller demonstrates abusive intent in light of all relevant circumstances, for example where the request is aimed at artificially creating the conditions for a compensation claim rather than genuinely understanding the processing and verifying its lawfulness. At first glance, the decision appears to offer controllers a long-awaited tool to push back against abusive or opportunistic DSARs. A closer reading, however, shows that the relief will probably be construed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from