Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2012

Links In The Chain: Recent Trends In Sub-Contracting

The case of "Leander Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 3449", heard before the Technology and Construction Court in the United Kingdom, recently considered the question as to whether a sub-contractor is under an implied obligation to a main contractor to proceed ‘regularly and diligently’ with the sub-contract works.

IrelandReal Estate and Construction

Is a sub-contractor required to proceed 'regularly and diligently' with sub-contract works?

The case of Leander Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 3449, heard before the Technology and Construction Court in the United Kingdom, recently considered the question as to whether a sub-contractor is under an implied obligation to a main contractor to proceed 'regularly and diligently' with the sub-contract works. The case provides useful guidance as to when a sub-contractor may be liable to a main contractor for losses suffered as a result of the sub-contractor's delay.

Background

Leander was a sub-contractor engaged by main contractor, Mulalley, to carry out various groundworks at a development site in London. The sub-contract entered into between the parties stated a commencement and completion date, but did not otherwise contain any contractual programme dates or provisions relating to the progress of the sub-contract works. Within approximately

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from