Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2019

OLA & Supposed Violation Of The Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Contributor
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India is a full-service top-tier firm. The firm is a pioneer in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India

Ultimately, it is for the State to ensure that it acts fairly and without malice.

IndiaTransport
Faisal Sherwani
Faisal Sherwani
Aditya Vikram
Aditya Vikram
Author LinkedIn connections

The recent incident involving suspension of license of the country's largest cab aggregator OLA for a period of six months by the Karnataka State Transport Authority for supposed violation of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016 ("Rules") was finally put to rest with imposition of a fine of Rs. 15 lakhs on OLA with commuters and drivers heaving a sigh of relief. Although, OLA in its statement expressed that it was glad that the situation had been resolved and regretted any inconvenience which may have been caused to its driver-partners and passengers, the action and mode of operation of the Government and the Transport Department has left much to be desired.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Termination, Recovery & Damages – Lessons From FW Aviation v Vietjet

The dispute in FW Aviation (Holdings) 1 Limited v VietJet Aviation Joint Stock Company1 has been decided through three substantial judgments of the English Commercial Court (“English Court”). Together, they address whether the aircraft leases were validly terminated, sums payable as a result of termination, and the extent to which damages could be claimed for losses arising from the condition, detention and delay in eventual export of the aircraft.
IndiaTransport
Tuli & Co
Tuli & Co
Article

Setting Up An MRO Facility In India

Opening an aircraft maintenance facility in India requires navigating three parallel regulatory tracks that operate on different timelines: airworthiness approval from the DGCA, land and airside access from airport operators, and duty treatment from customs authorities. This comprehensive legal guide examines the statutory framework under the new Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam 2024, the CAR-145 organization approval process, airport land allocation challenges, customs duty exemptions, and the state-level clear
IndiaTransport
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Aircraft Maintenance Reserve Clauses That Prevent Costly Redelivery Disputes

Aircraft maintenance reserve clauses and redelivery conditions are the two provisions most likely to trigger multi-million dollar disputes at the end of an aircraft lease agreement. This article examines the mechanics of Maintenance Reserve Funds, explores escrow versus lessor-retained custody structures, and provides detailed guidance on drafting quantified redelivery conditions that eliminate ambiguity when exposure is highest.
IndiaTransport
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Aircraft Repossession vs Going-Concern Value: How India’s New Insolvency Framework Changes The Position Of Aircraft Lessors

Airline insolvency presents a particularly difficult problem for insolvency law because the assets most critical to keeping the airline operational may not belong to the airline at all. Aircraft are frequently held under operating leases. When an airline enters insolvency, therefore, the resolution professional (“RP”) may be required to preserve the corporate debtor as a going concern while the aircraft lessor seeks to enforce its contractual and international-law rights to recover possession of its aircraft.
IndiaTransport
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Order In The Markets: SEBI's Regulatory Reset Of Early 2026

Between January and April 2026, the Securities and Exchange Board of India ("SEBI") pushed through a dense cluster of circulars and regulatory amendments – touching everything from merchant banker registration to the way retail investors receive an abridged prospectus. Some of these changes were long overdue; others were triggered by market stress. All of them, taken together, amount to a fairly significant recalibration of how India's capital markets participants will need to conduct themselves going forwa
IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Article

Interim Moratorium Under Section 14 Of The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code: An Evolving Jurisprudence

One of the defining features of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") is the moratorium under Section 14, which comes into effect upon admission of an application for initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) for corporate persons. The moratorium serves as a statutory calm period, protecting the corporate debtor from enforcement actions while enabling the resolution professional to preserve the debtor's assets and maximise value.
IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India
Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India