Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2025

Successor Developers Not Bound By Previous Allottees' Consent, Rules Bombay High Court

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Contributor
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Founded on a century of legal achievements, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (SAM & Co) was born...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

In Tuvin Constructions LLP v. MahaRERA (Writ Petition No. 1673 of 2025), the Bombay High Court ruled that a newly appointed developer can be registered as the promoter of a redevelopment project without obtaining consent from the allottees of the erstwhile developer.

IndiaReal Estate and Construction

In Tuvin Constructions LLP v. MahaRERA (Writ Petition No. 1673 of 2025), the Bombay High Court ruled that a newly appointed developer can be registered as the promoter of a redevelopment project without obtaining consent from the allottees of the erstwhile developer.

The Court reaffirmed that no contractual relationship exists between allottees of a previous developer and a successor developer, and any conditions to the contrary conflict with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act).

This ruling provides authoritative clarity for Maharashtra's real estate sector, particularly in cases where a society terminates a defaulting developer and entrusts the project to a successor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from